<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critique of Rob Bell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattpritchard.com/2006/10/28/critique-of-rob-bell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattpritchard.com/2006/10/28/critique-of-rob-bell/</link>
	<description>Connecting People and Communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 12:06:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mattpritchard.com/2006/10/28/critique-of-rob-bell/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orangewombat.com/blog/?p=45#comment-9</guid>
		<description>From Scott Simmon&#039;s Facebook blog:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So I always wondered what someone might really have to say as far as a well formed, critical argument opposing the emergent church. I have been extremely interested in what has been posted on a blog by Matt Pritchard, an old friend who tends to do an excellent job of chronicling his journey. I found this http://www.apprising.org/archives/2006/1... on one of his blog posts. I haven&#039;t had enough time to really formulate a response yet, though initially I see Ken Silva&#039;s argument as having a narrow perspective of the emergent church, as is defined by the community I am a part of. We feel that the greatest incarnational work of Christ is that which is done to &quot;the least of these&quot; (see Matthew 25), and though Jesus claims to be &quot;the way, the truth, and the life&quot; (see John 14), I understand that to be the description the Jews of the Old Testament held for the Torah. You might consider this to be a &quot;social&quot; gospel, however to limit the revolutionary, redemptive, restorational, relational message of Christ as I understand it to solely this one aspect is similar to those who abide in a &quot;once saved/always saved&quot; mindset that states that since they have affirmed their belief in Christ as their personal Lord and Savior, that they can then live their lives with reckless abandon, which I am certain is just as much of a misrepresentation of Calvinist and reformed theology as limiting emergent culture into a &quot;social gospel&quot; is. &lt;br /&gt;Well I suppose I had more to say than I thought, though I must say that in order to truly hear my response to this argument, or even to comprehend my understanding of the gospel, you must build a relationship with me, and be willing to build a relationship with Christ, the living breathing Word of God. For as any true &quot;emergent&quot; leader will tell you, it is only in an intimate community that challenges what we believe, that we can begin to discover the meaning of the gospel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Scott Simmon&#8217;s Facebook blog:</p>
<p>So I always wondered what someone might really have to say as far as a well formed, critical argument opposing the emergent church. I have been extremely interested in what has been posted on a blog by Matt Pritchard, an old friend who tends to do an excellent job of chronicling his journey. I found this <a href="http://www.apprising.org/archives/2006/1.." rel="nofollow">http://www.apprising.org/archives/2006/1..</a>. on one of his blog posts. I haven&#8217;t had enough time to really formulate a response yet, though initially I see Ken Silva&#8217;s argument as having a narrow perspective of the emergent church, as is defined by the community I am a part of. We feel that the greatest incarnational work of Christ is that which is done to &#8220;the least of these&#8221; (see <a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=45&amp;passage=Matthew+25" class="bibleref" title="AMP Matthew 25">Matthew 25</a>), and though Jesus claims to be &#8220;the way, the truth, and the life&#8221; (see <a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=45&amp;passage=John+14" class="bibleref" title="AMP John 14">John 14</a>), I understand that to be the description the Jews of the Old Testament held for the Torah. You might consider this to be a &#8220;social&#8221; gospel, however to limit the revolutionary, redemptive, restorational, relational message of Christ as I understand it to solely this one aspect is similar to those who abide in a &#8220;once saved/always saved&#8221; mindset that states that since they have affirmed their belief in Christ as their personal Lord and Savior, that they can then live their lives with reckless abandon, which I am certain is just as much of a misrepresentation of Calvinist and reformed theology as limiting emergent culture into a &#8220;social gospel&#8221; is. <br />Well I suppose I had more to say than I thought, though I must say that in order to truly hear my response to this argument, or even to comprehend my understanding of the gospel, you must build a relationship with me, and be willing to build a relationship with Christ, the living breathing Word of God. For as any true &#8220;emergent&#8221; leader will tell you, it is only in an intimate community that challenges what we believe, that we can begin to discover the meaning of the gospel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Silva</title>
		<link>http://www.mattpritchard.com/2006/10/28/critique-of-rob-bell/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orangewombat.com/blog/?p=45#comment-8</guid>
		<description>First let me say I am not offended. As the author of this post I&#039;d humbly suggest Matt that I might get more than you think re. Bell. :-)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ve been studying his work for months now. Here is my Rob Bell archive and perhaps this will help you see what he teaches more clearly:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.apprising.org/archives/rob_bell/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First let me say I am not offended. As the author of this post I&#8217;d humbly suggest Matt that I might get more than you think re. Bell. <img src='http://www.mattpritchard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been studying his work for months now. Here is my Rob Bell archive and perhaps this will help you see what he teaches more clearly:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apprising.org/archives/rob_bell/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apprising.org/archives/rob_bell/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

